JUDGMENT 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Though the relief prayed for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a detailed representation to the second respondent, with regard to the grant of planning permission, in respect of the property in question, and if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within the time specified by this Court. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the second respondent has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the petitioner is permitted to make a detailed representation, to the second respondent, along with the necessary enclosures in support of her claims, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the second respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks thereafter. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.