Ruchira Papers Ltd, M/S Sps Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. v. Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission
2013-11-11
RAJIV SHARMA, SANJAY KAROL
body2013
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGEMENT SANJAY KAROL, J.- 1. LEARNED counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that petitioner(s) have alternate/efficacious remedy, both under the provisions of Section 42 as also Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the impugned orders dated 2.5.2011 & 22.5.2012 (Annexures P8 & P9 in CWP No. 5992 of 2012); orders dated 2.5.2011 & 4.6.2013 (Annexures P5 & P6 in CWP No. 6151 of 2013); orders dated 3.5.2011 & 20.7.2012 (Annexures P3 & P8 in CWP No. 6134 of 2012); orders dated 3.5.2011 and 22.5.2012 (Annexures P-11 & P-12 in CWP No. 6411 of 2012); orders dated 3.5.2011 and 22.5.2012 (Annexures P-10 and P-11 in CWP No. 6412 of 2012); orders dated 3.5.2011 and 26.11.2011 (Annexures P-6 & P-7 in CWP No. 6709 of 2012); orders dated 2.5.2011 AND 22.5.2012 (Annexures P-11 AND P-12 in CWP No. 7216 of 2012); orders dated 2.5.2011 AND 24.5.2012 (Annexures P-6 AND P-9 in CWP No. 7537 of 2012), order dated 19.7.2011 (Annexure P6 in CWP No. 8195 of 2012), (Annexures P-9 & P-10 in CWP No. 9623 of 2012); orders dated 2.5.2011 AND 5.12.2011 (Annexures P-3 & P-4 in CWP No. 9696 of 2012); orders dated 2.5.2011 AND 26.11.2011 (Annexures P-4 & P-5 in CWP No. 9823 of 2012), demand notice dated 18.12.2012 (Annexure P2 in CWP No. 527 of 2013), order dated 27.12.2012 (Annexure P2 in CWP No. 528 of 2013), orders dated 22.2.2013 & 2.5.2011 (Annexures P-4 AND P-5 in CWP No. 1183 of 2013), orders dated 20.2.2013 & 2.5.2011 (Annexures P-4& P-5 in CWP No. 1184 of 2013); orders dated 2.5.2011 AND 19.2.2013 (Annexures P-4 AND P-6 in CWP No. 1235 of 2013); orders dated 2.5.2011& 27.4.2012 (Annexures P8 & P-9 in CWP No. 1696 of 2013); orders dated 2.5.2011 & 20.2.2013 (Annexures P-4 AND Annexure P5 in CWP No. 1760 of 2013); orders dated 2.5.2011 AND 8.2.2013 (Annexures P-4 & P-6 in CWP No. 1954 of 2013); orders dated 2.5.2011 AND 2.6.2012 (Annexures P-4 AND P- 5 in CWP No. 2498 of 2013); AND orders dated 2.5.2011 AND 5.6.2013 (Annexures P-5 & P-6 in CWP No. 6152 of 2013). They seek permission to withdraw the present petition(s) with liberty to take recourse to appropriate alternate remedy, in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) do not oppose such prayer. 2.
They seek permission to withdraw the present petition(s) with liberty to take recourse to appropriate alternate remedy, in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) do not oppose such prayer. 2. As such Liberty granted to the petitioners to withdraw the present petition(s) to enable them to initiate AND pursue appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. It stands clarified that since petitioner(s) have been pursuing the matter before this Court, limitation shall not come in their way. All interim order(s) stand vacated. All the Petitions stand disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any, in the aforesaid terms.