Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 958 (MAD)

V. Saroja v. Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

2013-02-14

M.JAICHANDREN

body2013
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 31.12.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 31.12.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 31.12.2012, to the second respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.