Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 961 (MAD)

D. Manikandan v. State Commissioner for Differently Abled, Chennai

2013-02-14

M.JAICHANDREN

body2013
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make an appropriate application, before the appropriate Committee, as per the directions of the Supreme Court, with regard to the establishment of 'Bunk Shops'. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for this court passing such an order. 4. In view of the above, it is made clear that it would be open to the petitioner to make an appropriate application before the Committee constituted, as per the directions issued by the Supreme Court, with regard to the establishment of 'Bunk Shops' within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It goes without saying that the Committee concerned would consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, as per the directions issued by the Supreme Court, without being influenced by the observations made by the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, in the impugned order, dated 18.9.2012. 5. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected M.P. is closed. No costs.