JUDGMENT 1. - Accused petitioner-Laxmi Narayan was convicted on 1.10.2004 under Section 7(1) reed with Section 16(1)(A)(i) Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajsamand and in appeal, Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track), Rajsamand by his judgment dated 19.6.2006 had set aside the judgment of the lower Court and matter was remanded by him for observance of formalities of Section 313 Cr.P.C. to the trial Court. Judgment of Additional Sessions Judge dated 19.6.2006 was again set aside by this Court in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 52/2007 on 4.8.2011 and matter was remanded back to Additional Sessions Judge for deciding the appeal of accused petitioner on merits. Then after Criminal Appeal No. 16/2011 titled as Laxmi Narayan v. State of Rajasthan was again decided by Sessions Judge, Rajsamand on 4.4.2013 and that appeal was dismissed by Sessions Judge, Rajsamand and the judgment dated 1.10.2004 of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajsamand in Criminal Regular Case No. 122/2000 was upheld. 2. Now again criminal revision petition has been filed by accused petitioner-Laxmi Narayan against the judgment dated 4.4.2013 of Sessions Judge, Rajsamand. Incident of selling of alleged adulterated milk had occurred on 5.4.2000 and even after passing of thirteen years from the date of the incident, we have not been able to conclude the criminal proceedings. Petitioner Laxmi Narayan is not ready to argue his criminal revision petition and he wants suspension of sentence only. In these circumstances, in the interest of justice, it is hereby ordered that if petitioner Laxmi Narayan deposits an amount of rupees fifteen thousand in the trial Court within four weeks from today and then after if he submits two bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each along with a personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court then the sentence passed by the Sessions Judge, Rajsamand on 4.4.2013 and sentence passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajsamand on 1.10.2004 be suspended till further orders. Amount of rupees fifteen thousand may be utilised at the time of final disposal of the revision towards fine and if fine is not imposed then it may be ordered to be refunded to the accused petitioner as per the judgment in criminal revision petition whatsoever as the case may be. The application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 397(1) [sic. 389(1)] Cr.P.C. is disposed of accordingly. The application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 397(1) [sic. 389(1)] Cr.P.C. is disposed of accordingly. The copy of this order be sent to both the Courts below.Application allowed. *******