JUDGMENT Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. This Crl. Misc. application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the entire proceeding of complaint case no.10977 of 2013, under section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur including summoning order dated 23.3.2014 passed by C.J.M., Saharanpur and further prayer is to stay the proceeding of aforesaid complaint case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that it is matrimonial dispute, however, on the basis of false allegation complaint was lodged hence entire proceeding is liable to be quashed. 4. Learned AGA opposed aforesaid prayer. 5. Considered the submission of counsel for the parties. Since the disputed question of facts requires appreciation of evidence hence at this initial stage it is not a fit case for interference under section 482 Cr.P.C. The defence version of the applicants has to be considered by the court concerned at appropriate stage. 6. However, in view of the aforesaid facts, if the applicants appear before the courts below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, it is expected that the same will be considered and disposed off expeditiously, if possible on the same day in view of the principles laid down by Full Bench of this Court in case of Amarawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004(57) ALR-390 and by the Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (4) SCC 437 . If due to any reason the bail application could not be disposed off same day, the applicants may be released on interim bail till disposal of the bail application. 7. With these observations, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby finally disposed off.