Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 1071 (MAD)

J. Jayakrishnan v. State of Tamil Nadu

2014-06-02

B.RAJENDRAN

body2014
Judgment : 1. The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents herein to release the sale deed dated 15.02.2013 registered as Document No.1081/2013 on the file of the fourth respondent herein. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he purchased the plot measuring 1200 sq.ft, on the western side of Plot No.1 in S.No.337/8, Chemmencherry Village from one A.Chinnaiah and got it registered on the file of the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent referred the above sale deed under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 for determining the market value to the third respondent. The third respondent issued Form 1 notice under Rule 4 of Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1968 dated 20.03.2013 demanding difference in Stamp duty. The petitioner submitted his objections, which was received by the third respondent on 10.04.2013. Even then, the sale deed was not released to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner sent a letter to the third for release of the sale deed. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition. 3. I heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 4. It is settled proposition of law that once a document is registered, the registering authority has no power to withhold the same. This was the view taken by this Court in (B. Rajappa and another Vs. The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps) The Office of the Collectorate (Vth Floor), Mr. Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Madras-1 and 2 others) reported in 2002 (3) CTC 544,Therefore, following the decision of this Court mentioned supra, the following direction is issued in this writ petition:- (i) The Registering Authority/fourth respondent is directed to release the sale deed dated 15.02.2013 to the petitioner forthwith. While releasing the sale deed dated 15.02.2013 to the petitioner, the respondent shall make necessary endorsement on the original document to the effect that the proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act are pending. (ii) The Registering Authority/fourth respondent shall make necessary entries in the register maintained regarding the pendency of 47-A proceedings in respect of the document, which is the subject matter of registration, so as to reflect the same in the encumbrance certificate for the benefit of the purchasers. (ii) The Registering Authority/fourth respondent shall make necessary entries in the register maintained regarding the pendency of 47-A proceedings in respect of the document, which is the subject matter of registration, so as to reflect the same in the encumbrance certificate for the benefit of the purchasers. (iii) Pending final decision, in respect of the valuation under Section 47-A (i), as per Section 47-A (4), there shall be a charge over the properties in favour of the Government in respect of the unpaid value of the stamp duty. (iv) After the entire proceedings under Section 47-A are completed, the registering authority shall make necessary endorsement removing the earlier endorsement clearly stating that the entire amount of stamp duty under the document has been paid in full and return the same. (v) After making such endorsement, the Registering Authority/fourth respondent shall also make necessary entry as to the completion of 47-A proceedings in the register maintained by them so as to reflect the same in the encumbrance certificate. (vi) It is open to the fourth respondent to finalise the proceedings initiated under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.