JUDGMENT Hon'ble Surendra Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A. and perused the material placed on record. 2. The revisionists by way of filing instant revision have prayed for setting aside order dated 13.1.2014 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Gautam Budh Nagar in Complaint Case No. 563 of 2012 (Agile Enterprises Inc. Versus Victory Electricals Ltd.) under Section 138 of Ni.I. Act. Police Station Sector-20, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar whereby he has rejected the discharge application moved on behalf of revisionists under Section 245(2) Cr.P.C. pursuant to the order dated 24.10.2013 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Application No. 37820 of 2013. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionists has submitted that impugned order dated 13.1.2014 rejecting the application for discharge which is wholly illegal, capricious and against the weight of evidence on record. He has further submitted that it transpires that the order has been passed illegally, in a routine manner and without application of judicial mind, hence without considering nature of evidence on record which is liable to be set a rest. 4. Indisputably, it is open to this Court to quash the charges framed by the trial court and discharge the accused revisionists but the same cannot be done by weighing the correctness, sufficiency of the evidence. The principle to be adopted in such cases should be that if the entire evidence produced by the prosecution is to be believed would it constitute the offence or not. It is only at the stage of the trial that truthfulness, sufficiency and acceptability of the evidence can be adjudged, therefore, it will not be proper to truncate or snip the proceeding at the stage of framing charges against the accused-revisionists. 5. The revision is bereft of any merit and the impugned order dated 13.1.2014 does not warrant any interference of this Court, therefore, this revision is hereby dismissed.