JUDGMENT Hon'ble Surendra Singh, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. and perused the material placed on record. 2. The revisionist by way of filing instant revision has prayed for setting aside order dated 4.2.2014 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur in Case No.396 of 2011 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Police Station Khutahan, District Jaunpur. 3. Submissions have been made on behalf of the revisionist that impugned order is vitiated by manifest error of law and suffers from illegality, perversity and miscarriage of justice. The finding recorded by the trial court is perverse and against the weight of evidence on record. It is further argued that in fact trial court has failed to consider documentary proof produced by the revisionist in support of his contention. It is further argued that the opposite party no.2 is not legally wedded wife of revisionist as he was married with one Smt. Tara Devi. He has got no concern with the opposite party no.2. The entire proceeding for grant of maintenance is illegal and deserves to be quashed. 4. Taking note of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material placed on record, I am of the view that impugned order passed by court below is well conformity in law and does not suffer from any illegality, irregularity or perversity. 5. The criminal revision is devoid of merit and liable to be dismissed. The criminal revision is accordingly dismissed.