JUDGMENT 1. - As per Section 305 I.P.C., if any person under eighteen years of age commits suicide, whoever abets commission of such suicide, shall be punished with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years and shall also be liable to fine. 2. In the present case, a girl of about seventeen years of age has committed suicide in suspicious circumstances in her own house and a suicide note in her own hand-writing was found near her dead body, which reads as under:- " 08238826010] 07742237838] 08141203198] bu rhu uEcj ls esjs ikik ds Qksu ij dkWy djrk vkSj eq>s ijs'kku djrk gS fd eq>ls nksLrh dj eSa esjs ikik eEeh ls Mjrh gwWa blfy;s budks ugha crk ldrh blfy;s eSa viuh tku ns jgh gS ikik gks lds rks eq>s ekQ dj nsukA ij bl yM+ds dks er NksM+uk bls ltk t:j fnykuk uk ikik vkidh Jyoti eSa vius eEeh ikik dh bZTtr ugha tkus ns ldrh blfy, eSa viuh tku ns jgh gwWa blesa esjs ?kj okyksa dk dksbZ nks"k ugha gS ml yM+ds dks ltk fnyokuk ikik Jyoti Deora" 3. F.I.R. No. 71/2014 under Section 305 I.P.C. was lodged by Police Station, Marward Junction, District-Pali by Parasnath, unfortunate father of the deceased. Juvenile delinquent Shrawan Kumar was arrested in the case and his bail application was dismissed under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short 'the JJ Act, 2000') by the Juvenile Justice Board, Pali on 4.4.2014, then he filed Criminal Appeal No. 40/2014 under Section 52 of the JJ Act of 2000 in the Court of Session Judge Pali and the said Criminal Appeal No. 40/2014 was also dismissed by the Sessions Judge, Pali on 5.4.2014. 4. Now, the Criminal Revision under Section 53 of JJ Act of 2000 has been filed on behalf of the juvenile delinquent. It has been argued on behalf of the petitioner-juvenile delinquent that the Juvenile Justice Board was apprehending that it will defeat the ends of justice if bail is granted to the juvenile delinquent, while the Session Judge was apprehending that if bail is granted to the juvenile delinquent then there are chances that it will bring the juvenile delinquent into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger. It has been argued on behalf of the juvenile delinquent that apparently there is contradiction between the apprehensions expressed by the Court below. It has also been argued on behalf of the juvenile delinquent that the juvenile delinquent Shrawan Kumar was a friend of deceased Kumari Jyoti and there were frequent exchange of talks between the two as is apparent from the call record of the deceased with juvenile delinquent and so it has been argued that when there was no charge in the battery of the mobile phone of deceased, she committed suicide only because of the fact that she was not able to talk to the juvenile delinquent Shrawan Kumar. 5. I have heard both the parties. I have also perused the case diary. The arguments raised on behalf of the juvenile delinquent are prima facie not acceptable to this Court of granting bail to him. A young girl of seventeen years 'age has been compelled to commit suicide in suspicious circumstances and in such matters, an early release of alleged main culprit will certainly defeat the ids of justice and so as per the provisions of Section 12(1) of the JJ Act, 2000, this is not a case in which benevolence of this Court should be exercised in favour of the juvenile delinquent Shrawan Kumar and hence he is not entitled to ail at this stage. Hence his Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 53 of the JJ Act, 2000 deserves dismissal which is hereby dismissed. A copy of this order be sent to both the Courts below along with the record of the case within three days positively.Revision dismissed. *******