Judgment : 1. By consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has filed civil suit in O.S.No.382 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Udumalpet and obtained an order of injunction. The 4th respondent filed application to implead as well as vacate injunction petition. Inspite of the same, respondent No.3 has foisted a false case against him and trying to dispossess him. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents No.1 to 3 submitted that a case has already been registered against the petitioner and the said respondents are not interfering with the inter se disputes between the parties. However, on facts, 4th respondent is in possession of the property. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent submitted that there is also a decree obtained by her as against the alleged landlord of the petitioner viz., one Radhakrishnan through whom the 5th respondent claimed title. The 5th respondent claims to be tenant of 6th respondent. It is 4th respondent, who is in possession. A civil dispute is sought to be canvassed before this Court by approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the 5th respondent submitted that it is factually correct to state that the petitioner is her tenant. Therefore, appropriate orders will have to be passed. 6. This Court is not inclined to go into the inter se disputes between the parties. The question as to whet ether the petitioner is in possession or the 4th respondent is in possession cannot be gone into. This Court is also of the view that in view of the categorical statement made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3 that the State authorities are not interfering with the civil dispute between the parties, there is no basis for the apprehension of petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. However, taking into consideration of the fact that the civil suit is pending in O.S.No.322 of 2011 on the file of District Munsif, Udumalpet, in which the 4th respondent filed implead petition, this Court directs the District Munsif's Court, Udumalpet to dispose of the said application within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Thereafter, the said Court is also directed to dispose of the vacate injunction petition as well as injunction application filed within a period of six weeks. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.