JUDGMENT Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal, J. Heard Smt. Archana Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Petitioners have preferred this petition for quashing of the order dated 10.3.2014 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Deoband in execution case no. 6 of 2012. 3. The petitioners have also prayed for a direction to the Additional District Court No. 7, Deoband, Saharanpur to decide their appeal/stay application in the appeal within a time bound period. 4. It appears that the respondents had filed suit for a decree of permanent injunction and the suit was decreed on 3.8.2012. 5. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment, order and decree petitioners preferred appeal no. 334 of 212. The said appeal was filed beyond the period of limitation and is accompanied by a delay condonation application. The delay in filing the appeal till date has not been condoned and as such the application of the petitioners for grant of stay has not been taken up for consideration. 6. In view of the above, as the appeal of the petitioners is pending since 2012 as defective, the appellate court is directed to proceed and decide the delay condonation application accompanying the appeal in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. Thereafter, if necessary to proceed on merits of the appeal and consideration of the stay application therein. 7. As far as challenge to the order dated 10.3.2014 passed by the executing court is concerned, as the petitioners have no stay order in appeal, they are not entitle to install the proceedings for execution. 8. In view of the above, the order dated 10.3.2014 needs no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. 9. The petition is disposed of with the above observation/direction.