Mahila Bahuddesiya Sahakari Samiti Jujhai Anubhag Karera Dist. Shivpuri v. State of M. P.
2014-10-09
SUJOY PAUL
body2014
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT Heard. Shri Sanjay Bahirani submits that the Principal Seat in W.P. No. 4283/2014 has disposed of an identical matter. The said order was followed by this court in W.P. No. 3301/2014 dated 16.06.2014. Considering the aforesaid, I deem it proper to follow the course adopted by the Principal Seat in the said matter. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to prefer objection/appeal against the impugned order before the competent authority within fifteen days from today along with copy of this order, failing which, interim protection shall not be available to the petitioner. In turn, the competent authority shall give adequate opportunity to the petitioner and decide the appeal in accordance with law expeditiously. Till appeal/objection of the petitioner is decided, the impugned order shall remain stayed and petitioner be permitted to run the fair price shop till final decision is taken by the competent authority. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits. Petition is disposed of.