JUDGMENT : Heard. 2. This is the first application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. 3. The applicant apprehends her arrest in connection with Crime No. 93/2014 registered at Police Station Pahadgarh district Morena for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(g), 342, 506 of IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of SC/ST P.A. Act and Section 3/4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 4. It is alleged that the prosecutrix a minor of 17 years and a member of Schedule Caste was abducted by the accused persons Dwarika and Siyaram and she was kept in the house of the present applicant and she was subjected to sexual intercourse. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not been named in the FIR and nor she was named in the statement. But subsequently their statements under Section 164(5) of Cr.P.C. were recorded before the Magistrate, her name appeared for the first time. He also submitted that in the house of the applicant, the accused is running a tent house. The applicant is falsely implicated. She be enlarged on bail. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor for the State opposed the application for bail. Keeping in view the alleged offence, it would not be proper to invoke the provision of Section 438 of Cr.P.C. 7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. If the applicant approaches before the learned Trial Court, the trial court may decide the application for regular bail as expeditiously as possible.