JUDGMENT : Heard. 2. This Review Petition has been filed by the petitioner for correction of the typographical error occurred in the order dt.25.9.2014 passed in W.P.No.5532/2010. 3. It is submitted that in the aforesaid order, it is mentioned that detailed order has been passed in W.P.No.5529/2014, however, the correct number of writ petition is W.P.No.5529/2010. We have verified the record and the contention mentioned by the petitioner is true. 4. Hence, the Review Petition is allowed. In the order dt.25.9.2014 passed in W.P.No.5532/2010, where it is mentioned as “W.P.No.5529/2014”, it be read as “W.P.No.5529/2010”. Review petition is disposed of accordingly.