JUDGMENT : Heard. 2. The grievance, as canvassed by the petitioners, is that the respondents have erred in deleting the names of the petitioners from the relevant column of khasra/revenue record (Annexure P-1). It is argued that the petitioners are in possession of the land and respondents have erred in deleting their names from the revenue record. It is further prayed that the respondents be restrained from dispossessing the petitioners from the land in question. A further prayer is made to direct the State Government to correct the 'khasra' entries in favour of the petitioners. 3. Prayer is opposed by Shri B.Raj Pandey, learned Government Advocate. In the opinion of this Court, for the present grievance the petitioners have an efficacious alternative statutory remedy. The petitioners can seek correction of khasra entries under the provisions of M.P.Land Revenue Code. If the petitioners are apprehending dispossession, they have a remedy under the Civil Law. 4. In view of availability of efficacious remedy, I am not inclined to entertain this petition. Petition stands disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail the said remedy.