Judgment : S. Rajeswaran, J. 1. Both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent-Bank would submit that this civil revision petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat. They have also produced a copy of the letter received from the first respondent-Bank No.SARB/MBL/11308 dated 29.4.2014 certifying that the petitioner herein has settled the amount outstanding to the first respondent-Bank under Bank Adalat dated 28.3.2014 and that the loan account is since closed on 29.4.2014. The said submission of the learned counsel on either side is recorded. The letter of the first respondent-Bank dated 29.4.2014 is also taken on file. With regard to the refund of court fee sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is submitted that the settlement has been effected before the Lok Adalat and the petitioner is entitled to the same, for which the petitioner may file a petition before the appropriate Forum and the same shall be considered and necessary orders be passed for refund of the court fee. 2. The Civil Revision Petition is closed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connection miscellaneous petition is also closed.