JUDGMENT Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J. (Oral) - The petitioners have preferred the instant petition for the grant of concession of regular bail, in a case registered against them, vide FIR No.50 dated 31.7.2014, on accusation of having committed an offence punishable u/s 306 IPC by the police of Police Station GRP, Kurukshetra. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable help and considering the entire matter deeply, to my mind, the present petition for regular bail deserves to be accepted in this regard. 4. Precisely, the prosecution, inter-alia, claimed that on 28.7.2014, Jeet Ram, father of complainant Sudarshan Saini alias Rinku (for brevity “the complainant”) has committed suicide and petitioners have abetted the commission of pointed crime. What cannot possibly be disputed here is that the complainant was present at the time of preparation of inquest report. The police recorded his statement, wherein, he has stated that his father had died as he was entangled by running train. No body had any grudge against him or his father. Thereafter, on 31.7.2014, the instant case was registered on the basis of suicide note of the deceased. Even in his statement, which formed the basis of FIR, the complainant has alleged that his father has committed suicide because the petitioners did not permit him to irrigate his land from the tubewell water. In that eventuality, as to whether the penal provision of section 306 IPC is attracted to the case of petitioners or not, inter alia, would be a moot point to be decided during the course of trial after receipt of evidence of the parties by the trial Court. 5. Be that as it may, the petitioners were arrested on 4.8.2014. Since then, they are in judicial custody and no useful purpose would be served to further detain them in jail. There is no history of their previous involvement in any other criminal case Even since the prosecution has not yet examined a single witness, so, the final conclusion of trial will naturally take a long time. 6. Since then, they are in judicial custody and no useful purpose would be served to further detain them in jail. There is no history of their previous involvement in any other criminal case Even since the prosecution has not yet examined a single witness, so, the final conclusion of trial will naturally take a long time. 6. In the light of aforesaid reasons, taking into consideration the totality of facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as depicted here-in-above and without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of trial, the instant petition for regular bail is hereby accepted. The petitioners are ordered to be released on regular bail on their furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 7. Needless to mention that, nothing observed here-in-above, would reflect, on the merits of the case, in any manner, during the trial, as the same has been so recorded for a limited purpose of deciding the present petition for regular bail only. ---------0.B.S.0------------ —————————