Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 1476 (MP)

Kuldeep Sarkar v. State Of M. P.

2014-11-14

B.D.RATHI, S.K.GANGELE

body2014
ORDER : Shri A. B. Tripathi, Advocate for applicant- Dr. Kuldeep Sarkar. 2. Shri Prabal Solanki, Public Prosecutor for non-applicant/State. 3. They are heard. 4. This is third application under section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code filed on behalf of applicant Dr. Kuldeep Sarkar for grant of bail. Earlier two applications (M. Cr. C. Nos. 5921/2014 and 6944/2014) have been dismissed on the ground that at that time, charge-sheet was not filed. 5. As per reply to bail application filed by State, following facts have been mentioned in the reply in opposing the bail :- 6. Applicant has been arrested and is in custody since 25th June, 2014 in connection with Crime No. 449/2013, registered against him at Police Station Jhansi Road, District Gwalior for the offences punishable under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 201 of IPC and section 3/4 of M. P. Recognized Examination Act. 7. Allegation against the present applicant is that he appeared in PMT Examination on behalf of two students and secured their admission in MBBS Course. Apart from this, it is alleged that applicant had also contacted some students and made available to them question papers. However, name of those students have not been mentioned. Neither their statements have been recorded by the Police. 8. After going through the charge-sheet, in our opinion, investigation of the case is improper. It was obligatory on the part of the prosecution to find out the students against whom it is alleged that applicant had made available to them the question papers. Apart from that, it was also obligatory on the part of the prosecution to record the statements of those students. Applicant is in custody since 25th June, 2014. The Principal Seat at Jabalpur in the case of Sanjeev Saxena vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2014 Cr.L.R. (MP) 560 has granted bail to other accused person against whom allegation is that he secured admission of three students. The Main Seat in Sanjeev Saxena (supra) has passed the following order :- "Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant has been named as accused in connection with Crime No. 18/2013 registered with Police Station- S. T. F., District Bhopal- commonly known as VYAPAM scam cases. 3. The Main Seat in Sanjeev Saxena (supra) has passed the following order :- "Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant has been named as accused in connection with Crime No. 18/2013 registered with Police Station- S. T. F., District Bhopal- commonly known as VYAPAM scam cases. 3. The role ascribed to the applicant is that he acted as middleman between three candidates and in association with the main conspirators namely, Nitin Mohindra and Sudhir Sharma indulged in commission of unfair means during the Police Constable Recruitment Examination, 2012. 4. It is, however, not in dispute that the investigation of Crime No. 18/2013 qua the applicant has been completed. His further presence is not required by the Investigating Officer as of now. 5. No doubt, the applicant has been named as accused in three other offences and is shown to be in custody in other two offences so far, however, grant of bail in this matter would not ensure to the applicant in those cases which will have to be considered on its own merits. 6. We agree with the argument of the applicant that the applicant is entitled for parity with the case of Akhilesh Singh Chaturvedi. 7. It has also come on record that the principal accused persons, namely, Nitin Mohindra and Sudhir Sharma, associated with the applicant have been arrested; and three beneficiaries, namely, Durgesh Singh Purbiya, Brajesh Sahu and Bharat Singh Thakur have been enlarged on bail. 8. Since the presence of the applicant is no more required by the Investigating Officer as of now as is stated by the Investigating Officer through counsel for the State, coupled with the fact that the applicant through Counsel has assured that he will extend full cooperation during further investigation in the said case as and when required; and that he will also appear before the Court punctually during the trial, in the interest of justice, the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with Crime No. 18/2013 on following strict conditions considering the fact that he is also involved in other three offences of same crime : (1) The applicant shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakh) with two solvent local sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his regular appearance during the trial in connection with Crime No. 18/2013 in Police Station S. T. F. Bhopal; (2)The applicant shall also comply with the conditions enumerated under section 437(3) of Criminal Procedure Code meticulously; and (3) Additionally, the applicant will report to the Police Station Kamla Nagar, District Bhopal (M.P.) once a week on every Sunday between 10.00 A. M. to 12.00 noon unless required to attend the office of the Investigating Officer at Bhopal on that day. The bail application stands disposed of accordingly." 9. Looking to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Gwalior, for his regular appearance before the trial Court concerned during the trial and shall also comply with the conditions enumerated under section 437(3) of Criminal Procedure Code. 10. The Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the Director General of Police, Bhopal and in-charge of Special Investigation Team (SIT). The Investigating Authority may take proper investigation and collection of evidence. Even though, the Authority may also think of filing of additional Charge-sheet. 11. M. Cr. C. stands disposed of accordingly. 12. Certified copy.