JUDGMENT Surendra Singh, J: - Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri S.T. Ali, learned counsel for the informant and the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that for a civil dispute between the parties instrumentality of criminal process has been utilized for putting pressure on the applicant. It was argued that civil litigation is also pending before the court concerned. It was further argued that the applicant is wholly innocent and falsely implicated in the present crime. More so the applicant being in jail since 27.10.2013 having no criminal history to his credit deserves to be released on bail at this stage. 3. The bail is, however, opposed by the learned counsel for the informant and the learned A.G.A. 4. The points pertaining to nature of accusation, severity of punishment, reasonable apprehension of tampering the witnesses, prima facie, satisfaction regarding proposed evidence and genuineness of the prosecution case were duly considered. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant- Mohd. Babu involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: - 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. 2. The applicant will not pressurise/ intimidate the prosecution witness. 3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 6. In case of breach of the above conditions, the prosecution would be at liberty to move application for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.