JUDGMENT : Rajiv Sharma, J. 1. Short reply not filed. The right to file reply is closed. 2. Respondent No. 3 issued an advertisement on 13.12.2011 for filling up the post of PGT (Informatics Practices). The petitioner also participated in the selection process. He appeared in the written test on 5.8.2012. The petitioner was called for viva-voce on 26.6.2013. According to the petitioner, he has answered question No. 155 by giving option =A' correctly. Question No. 155 reads as under: ?155. Choose the correct spellings from the alternative A, B, C & D each of the following questions: (A) Supersede (B) Superseed (C) Supercede (D) Superceed.? 3. We have gone through Annexure P-5, Answer-key. The petitioner has opted for =A', however, in the revised answer key, the answer has been changed from =A' to =C'. The standard spelling is =supersede' rather than =supercede'. The action of the respondents of revising the key answer from =A' to =C' was palpably wrong. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The answer to question No. 155 in revised answer key Annexure P-6, i.e. from =A' to =C' is quashed and set aside. It is declared that the correct answer was =A' as per Annexure P-5. Respondent No. 3 is directed to revise the result within a period of two weeks from today and thereafter to recommend the name of the petitioner for the post of PGT (Informatics Practices), within one week thereafter. The appointment letter shall be issued by respondent-State within one week after the receipt of the recommendation from respondent No. 3, if necessary, by creating supernumerary post. 5. Pending application (s), if any shall also stand disposed of.