JUDGMENT Surendra Singh, J: - Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is not named in the first information report. His complicity as a participant in the crime is based upon the recovery of motor-cycle from his possession, which is not supported by any independent witness. In fact, nothing was recovered from the possession of the applicant and he has been falsely implicated in the present crime. It was further argued that applicant, who is in jail since 1.9.2013 ,having no criminal history to his credit, deserves to be released on bail. 3. The bail is, however, opposed by the learned A.G.A. 4. The points pertaining to nature of accusation, severity of punishment, reasonable apprehension of tampering the witnesses, prima facie, satisfaction regarding proposed evidence and genuineness of the prosecution case were duly considered. 5. Considering totality of circumstances of the case, I consider it a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant Kedar Singh @ K.K. involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: - 1. That the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. 2. He will cooperate in the trial bonafidely without seeking adjournments. 3. He shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.