Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 1623 (HP)

Karam Singh v. Managing Director

2014-11-12

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN

body2014
JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. 1. It is contended that the petitioner was appointed as Conductor in the year 2007, was posted at Shimla till 21st January, 2010, thereafter, was transferred to Reckong Peo, District Kinnaur, which is a tribal area, on 21st January, 2010, has completed his normal tenure, as given in the transfer policy, on 21st January, 2013, but despite that, the respondents have not transferred him and is still working on the said post. 2. Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate, waives notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. We hope and trust that learned Advocate General will advise all the departments to strictly follow the transfer policy, particularly in case of the persons, who are posted at hard/tribal areas. 4. At this stage, learned Advocate General stated that all the departments concerned be directed to ensure that the employee (s), who is/are transferred to tribal/hard areas, join (s) forthwith, in default, the departments are to draw disciplinary action. 5. We deem it proper to dispose of this writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for his transfer within one week. Respondents are also directed to draw disciplinary action against the transferred employee (s), who fail (s) to join within the stipulated period. 6. Learned Advocate General is at liberty to convey this direction to the Heads of all the Departments. 7. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly alongwith all pending applications. Copy dasti.