JUDGMENT Mr. Jitendra Chauhan, J.: - The petitioners seek regular bail in case FIR No.84 dated 19.08.2014, registered under Sections 18 and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (for short, ‘the NDPS Act’) at P.S. Ajitwal, Distt. Moga. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have been falsely implicated at the instance of Gurcharan Singh, from whom the petitioners had taken a loan of Rs.1.00 lac. The petitioners moved a representation against the false implication before the Inspector General of Police (Law and Order) Punjab, Annexure P- 2, which was marked to the DIG Ferozepur Range. Pending inquiry as well as without receipt of the FSL report, the challan has been presented in the instant case on 04.12.2014. The petitioners are in custody since 19.08.2014. They are not involved in any other FIR. 3. On the other hand, the learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that 3 kgs 20 gms opium has been recovered from the petitioners, which is commercial quantity. However, he informs that the FSL report is still awaited. 4. Heard. 5. The petitioners are in custody since 19.08.2014. They are not involved in any other case. Allegedly, 3 kgs. 20 gms. of opium was recovered from the vehicle owned by petitioner No.1. Though, the quantity allegedly recovered from the petitioners is commercial in nature, but considering the fact that neither the inquiry with regard to false implication is concluded nor the FSL report is on record, the Court is inclined to accept the present petition. 6. Keeping in view the above and the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in CRM-M-13140-2014, titled as Inderjeet Singh @ Laddi Vs. State of Punjab, [2014(4) Law Herald (P&H) 3560 (DB)] : decided on 31.01.2014, without adverting to the merits of the instant case, the petitioners are ordered to be admitted to interim bail, till the receipt of the FSL report, subject to their furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds, to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 7. Disposed of. —————————