JUDGMENT Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The submission on behalf of the applicants is that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to village party bandi. There is no independent witness of the occurrence. The applicants have no other criminal history to their credit except the present case. The applicants were in fact arrested from their house and have been wrongly challaned in present case. No recovery of wine has taken place from their possession. 3. The learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that huge quantity of illicit liquor of different quantity has been recovered from the applicants for which no plausible explanation has been furnished by the applicants. 4. Considering the rival submissions and the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, this bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicants Shiv Janam Yadav and Mantoo Yadav, involved in case crime no. 237 of 2014, under Sections 272, 273, 284 I.P.C. & section 60 of Excise Act, Police Station Kotwali, district Azamgarh, be released on bail on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (1) The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (2) The applicants will not pressuruze/intimidate the prosecution witness. (3) The applicants will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. 6. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.