Judgment 1. This writ petition has been listed before me as a specially ordered case on the orders of the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice dated 25.06.2014. 2. The Teachers Recruitment Board, Government of Tamil Nadu, conducted Tamil Nadu Teachers' Eligibility Test-2013, as per the Notification No.3 of 2013, on 22.5.2013. The petitioner participated in the said examination. Her Roll Number is 13TE057201373. The question papers were in four series. The questions were of objective type. The petitioner was supplied with 'C' series question paper for Paper - II. She has secured 88 marks. According to the petitioner, for question Nos.7, 12, 14, 19, 28, 29, 66, 69 & 76 though, she had answered rightly, she has not been awarded each one mark to the said questions. 3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and I have also perused the records carefully. 4. It is brought to my notice by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the correctness of the said question Nos. 7, 12, 14, 19, 28, 29, 66 & 69 have been decided by this Court in earlier writ petitions in W.P(MD) Nos.18223, 18577, 18394, 18615, 18335, 18800 & 18576 of 2013. In view of the said admitted position, no further adjudication is required in respect of the key answers for these questions. 5. Now, what remains to be adjudicated is question No.76 in Paper – II 'C' Series. Question No.76 reads as follows:- “76.Collecting food for cattle is known as A) grazing B) foraging C) fostering D) foraying” 6. According to the Teachers Recruitment Board, option “B” (foraging) is the right answer. But, according to the petitioner, option “A” (grazing) is the right answer. 7. Today, three experts in the said subject are present before this Court, who are Ms. P. Subbulakshmi (P.G Assistant-English), from the JQVV Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Virugambakkam, Chennai – 600 019; Ms. M. Savithri (P.G Assistant-English), Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Villivakkam, Chennai – 600 049 and Ms. P.M.R. Kannika Parameswari (B.T Assistant English), Government Higher Secondary School, Virugambakkam, Chennai – 600 019. This Court had the benefit of hearing them also. According to them, option 'B' (foraging) is the right answer. Whereas, according to the petitioner, option 'A' (grazing) is the right answer. 8. P.M.R. Kannika Parameswari (B.T Assistant English), Government Higher Secondary School, Virugambakkam, Chennai – 600 019. This Court had the benefit of hearing them also. According to them, option 'B' (foraging) is the right answer. Whereas, according to the petitioner, option 'A' (grazing) is the right answer. 8. The Experts would submit that foraging is an act by which one goes out to collect food for the cattle, whereas, in the matter of grazing, the cattle is taken to the place where the food is available and made to eat. I have verified the same with the New Oxford Dictionary of English also. I am in full agreement with the experts that foraging is an act by which one goes out to collect food for the cattle whereas, in the matter of grazing, the cattle is taken to the place where the food is available and the cattle is made to eat. In view of the same, the challenge made by the petitioner is to be rejected. 9. At this juncture, I have to say that the power of this Court to interfere with the decision of experts in respect of key answers has been elaborately dealt with in a number of judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, about which, I need not elaborate. I deem it suffice to refer to the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in Kanpur University vs. Samir Gupta and Others reported in (1983) 4 Supreme Court Cases 309, wherein the Supreme Court has held that if the key answer is demonstrably wrong, then only, this Court has got power to interfere with the same. Applying the said decision, we have to examine this case as to whether the key answer set by the respondents is demonstrably wrong. Here, in this case, the petitioner is not able to demonstrate that the key answer pertaining to question No.76 is wrong. 10. In view of all the above, the writ petition fails and accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs. Interim order already granted is vacated. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.