JUDGMENT Hon'ble Harsh Kumar, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that he was on bail vide order dated 8.11.2013 in this case of road accident and without informing him Non-bailable warrant has been issued against him vide order dated 7.5.2014 so the entire proceedings as well as the order dated 7.5.2014 of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrar, Court No.4, Aligarh in case crime No.311 of 2014, State Vs. Prem Pal under sections 279, 337, 304-A, 427 IPC, P.S.Sasani Gate, Aligarh be quashed. He further argued that the alleged information sent through notice dated 29.4.2014 was vague as the alleged notice neither bears seal of the registration nor it is on the prescribed proforma. 3. Learned AGA opposed and stated that despite he is on bail since notice was given to the applicant for appearing before the court on 7.5.2014, the non-bailable warrant has been rightly issued due to his deliberate absence and there is no reason for quashing either the impugned order dated 7.5.2014 issuing non-bailable warrant or entire proceedings as well. 4. The prayer for quashing the proceedings and the operation of impugned order dated 7.5.2014 is refused. 5. However, it is provided that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered expeditiously and decided in view of the settled law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2004 (57) ALR 290, as well as by Hon'ble Apex Court in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. and during the above period no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. The application is finally disposed off accordingly.