Ananda Natesan v. Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District
2014-07-04
G.CHOCKALINGAM
body2014
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment : 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to the respondents police to register the petitioner's complaint dated 12.06.2013. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents. This Court has also perused the records. 3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that after thorough enquiry, the complaint given by the petitioner was closed by the second respondent police. He has also submitted a closure report, in which, it is stated as follows:- “LANGUAGE” 4. In view of the above findings given by the second respondent police, the prayer, as sought for by the petitioner, cannot be granted. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the report of the second respondent police, he is at liberty to proceed before the appropriate forum according to law.