JUDGMENT 1. - This writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.12.2014 passed by the trial court, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 11, Rule 12 and 14 CPC has been rejected. 2. The petitioner filed an application inter-alia seeking the record of the Nagar Nigam, Jodhpur pertaining to the dispute before the trial court. 3. The trial court on coming to the conclusion that the certified copies of the documents, which the petitioner wanted to produce, could have been obtained and there was no reason for summoning the record of the Nagar Nigam and rejected the application. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the entire case of the respondents has been regarding grant of no objection certificate by the Nagar Nigam whereas none exist and therefore, the record should have been summoned by the trial court. 5. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. A bare look at the application produced by the petitioners under Order 11, Rule 12 and 14 CPC indicates that the application was absolutely vague, inasmuch as, it was not pointed out as to what was sought to be summoned and the prayer was made that the record be summoned. 7. The trial court was justified in rejecting the application as the application for summoning the record / file of the authority without indicating a specific document, would give an open handed right to the parties to rely on any of the documents contained in the record without opportunity to the other side. 8. In that view of the matter, no case for interference is made out in the order passed by the trial court, the writ petition is dismissed.Petition Dismissed. *******