JUDGMENT Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, J. The petitioners who claim to be shopkeepers, running shops on land bearing Khasra No.305, Village Bojhbhar, Andar Nagar Palika, Bilgram, district Hardoi, claim that the sixth respondent is attempting to forcibly dispossess them. It has been alleged that the sixth respondent managed to get his name recorded in the revenue records 'at any time' between December 2013 and January 2014 over Gata No.305 and that he wishes to construct a Madarsa, Mosque and Slaughter House on the land. 2. The petitioners dispute the title and interest of the sixth respondent. Two reliefs have been sought in these proceedings. The first is an enquiry into the charges levelled against the Lekhpal of having colluded with the sixth respondent for making a forgery in the revenue records. The second relief is for an injunction against the dispossession of the petitioners from the land. 3. Prima facie, at this stage, the petitioners have not produced material which would indicate that there has been a forgery in the revenue records so as to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution. Merely annexing the revenue extracts for certain periods would not lead to the inference of a forgery. In so far as the relief against dispossession is concerned, which is in the nature of the primary relief claimed, the petitioners have a remedy available before the appropriate forum for grant of an injunction. Moreover, the petitioners have a remedy available under Section 33/39 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 for the correction of the revenue records. 4. We clarify that this order shall not be construed to be the expression of any opinion on the merits of the case. We, therefore, leave it open to the petitioners to pursue the appropriate remedies available in law for the correction of the revenue records and in regard to their claim for possession. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.