Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 2244 (ALL)

Narendra v. State of U. P

2014-07-30

RAVINDRA SINGH

body2014
JUDGMENT Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. 2. This petition has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the proceedings of case No.2410 of 2012 under section 323, 504, 506 IPC and section 3(1)X SC/ST Act pending i the court of learned A.C.J.M., Court No. 3 Hardoi. 3. From the perusal of the record it reveals that in the present case a complaint has been filed by O.P No. 2, on which the learned Magistrate concerned after recorded the statement under section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. summoned the applicants to face the trial. The learned Magistrate concerned has not committed any error in passing the impugned order. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the proceedings of the above mentioned case including the summoning order dated 8.5.2013 is refused. 4. However, considering the fact, it is directed that that in case the applicants appears before the court concerned within 30 days from today and apply for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of in view of Smt. Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2005 Cr.L.J. 755 which has been approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Sigh Versus State of U.P reported in 2009(4) S.C.C. 437 . 5. It is further directed that at the appropriate stage in case the applicants move discharge application, the same shall be heard and disposed of in accordance with law. 6. With this direction, this application is finally disposed of.