Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 2276 (MAD)

G. v. S. S. Durgaprasad VS State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai

2014-08-01

M.VENUGOPAL

body2014
Judgment : M. Venugopal. J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused, has made an endorsement in the Criminal Original Petition to the following effect. “The petitioner may kindly be permitted not to press this petition, since the trial is almost over and the points raised in this petition may be considered by the trial Court if directed by this Hon'ble Court”. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner/appellant to raise all factual and legal pleas before the trial Court in C.C.No.41 of 2008, at the time of final / main hearing of the case. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.