C. R. Saravanan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep. Through Its Secretary
2014-08-06
S.NAGAMUTHU
body2014
DigiLaw.ai
Order 1. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 and the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent and I have also perused the records carefully. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has argued the matter at length. At one stage, when this Court pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioners as to how these writ petitions are maintainable, when the petitioners have an alternative remedy before the Labour Court, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that he does not press these writ petitions. However, liberty may be given to approach the Labour Court. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has also made an endorsement to that effect. 4. In view of the above, both the writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed. However, liberty is given to the petitioners to raise an appropriate industrial dispute before the Labour Court, challenging the dismissal order and the confirmation order passed by the Registrar. In any such challenge is made, the same shall be entertained by the Labour Court, without referring to the period of limitation, if any, provided, the petitioners raise the industrial dispute before the Labour Court within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.