JUDGMENT Hon'ble Vipin Sinha, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri R. K. Singh Baghel, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed for quashing the chargesheet dated 1.6.2014 as well as entire proceedings of case no. 836 of 2014; State Vs. Subhash and others, arising out of case crime no. 29 of 2014, U/s 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Ranipur, District Mau pending in the court of Additional Magistrate-II, Mau. 3. The contention of the counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. 4. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicant has got a right of discharge under Section 239 or 227/228 Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the averments made in the present application, the prayer for quashing the proceedings of the aforementioned case is refused. 6. However, it is provided that in case, the applicants move an appropriate application for discharge through counsel before the concerned Court below within a period of one month from today, the same shall be considered and disposed off as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, by the concerned Court below preferably within a period of four months, thereafter. For a period of five months from today or till the disposal of the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed off.