Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 2463 (MAD)

P. Malaichamy v. District Collector, Madurai District

2014-08-07

M.JAICHANDREN, R.MAHADEVAN

body2014
Judgment : M. Jaichandren, J. 1. Heard Mr. G. Thalaimutharasu, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. C. Selvaraj, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr. T.S. Mohamed Mohideen, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the third respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 09.06.2014, is directed to be disposed of, by the first respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the third respondent have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties concerned, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 09.06.2014, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording sufficient opportunity to the parties concerned, including the third respondent herein. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 09.06.2014, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear, that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.