Judgment 1. The impugned F.I.R has been filed based on the complaint given by the second respondent under Sections 341, 294(b), 353 and 506(ii) IPC. The said F.I.R is being challenged before this Court. 2. Both the petitioner and the second respondent are present before this Court today and categorically stated that the issue has been solved between the parties and a Joint Memo of Compromise dated 30.07.2014 duly signed by the parties, has been filed before this Court. 3. Though the FIR has been registered, the learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) submits that after the investigation, a final report has been filed in C.C.No.264 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchendur, Thoothukudi District. 4. In the light of the above developments, no useful purpose will be achieved in proceeding further. Accordingly, the F.I.R is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. 5. In view of quashing of F.I.R, the trial Court is directed to handover the possession of the vehicle to the petitioner/accused. Therefore, the case in C.C.No.264 of 2014 is also consequently quashed.