G. Manikandan v. State rep. by The Inspector of Police
2014-08-11
N.KIRUBAKARAN
body2014
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment 1. The F.I.R has been registered at the instance of the second respondent against the petitioner herein under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.95 of 2014 on 06.04.2014. The said F.I.R is being challenged before this Court. 2. When the matter is called today, all the parties are present before this Court. The second respondent/de-facto complainant would submit that the matter has been settled between the first petitioner and herself and she does not want to proceed further in the matter. A Joint Memo of Compromise dated 23.07.2014, duly signed by the parties, has been filed before this Court. 3. In view of the Joint Memo of Compromise and the statement made by the parties, no useful purpose will be achieved in proceeding further. Accordingly, the F.I.R is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed.