Judgment : 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. In these writ petitions, there is a dispute between the petitioner in W.P.(md).No.11620 of 2014, Mr. M. Natarajan and the petitioner in W.P.(md).No.1533 of 2014, Mrs. Prasanya, with regard to Cable TV operation. The impugned proceeding is the proceeding initiated by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri under Section 107(i) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 3. It is submitted by the learned Additional Government Pleader that there is a serious issue prevailing in the area, at the instance of both the petitioners and as a result, there is a law and order problem and several complaints have been received and the same have been registered under Section 107(i) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the matter is now enquired by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri. At this stage, the present writ petition has been filed. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in both the writ petitions submitted that both the writ petitioners are ready and willing to appear before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri for enquiry. So that the matter could be heard and decided by the first respondent/ Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri. 5. In the light of the above agreement between the parties, there will be a direction to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri to fix a date for appearance of both the writ petitioners and such date of appearance to be intimated to the parties by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri. On such date, both the writ petitioners namely Mr. M. Natarajan and Mrs. Prasanya shall appear before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri and place all the records in their possession. The petitioners shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing. Thereafter, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri is directed to decide the matter on merits and in accordance with law. Till a decision is taken, status-quo, which is prevailing as on date, shall continue. It is made clear that during the course of enquiry, there shall not be any threat to either of the party. 6. With the above observation, both the writ petitions are disposed of. Consequently, connected M.P.(Md).Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 in W.P.(Md).No.11620 of 2014 are closed. No costs.