Vaigai Sekar v. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Aundipatti Police Station
2014-08-20
N.KIRUBAKARAN
body2014
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment : 1. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/de-facto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioner and 26 others in Crime No.502 of 2012 and after investigation, a final report has been filed in P.R.C.No.23 of 2013 under Sections 147, 148 IPC and Section 3(i) of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 r/w Section 149 IPC. The said proceedings are challenged before this Court. 2. When the matter is called today, both the petitioner as well as the second respondent are present before this Court and they would categorically make a statement that the matter has been settled with the intervention of the elders in the village. The second respondent also filed an affidavit stating that the matter has been compromised. 3. In view of the above development, no fruitful result will be achieved by further proceeding in the matter. 4. In view of the above, the P.R.C.No.23 of 2013 on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatti, Theni District, is quashed against the petitioner alone and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are closed.