Judgment : M. Jaichandren, J. 1. Heard Mr. C.K.M. Appaji, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. K.P. Krishnadoss, the learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the first respondent, Mr. V.R. Shanmuganathan, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3 and Mr. K. Sathiya Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the fourth respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 29.07.2014, is directed to be disposed of, by the third respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the first respondent, the Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3 and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the fourth respondent have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the third respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 29.07.2014, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 29.07.2014, to the third respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear, that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.