Judgment 1. The petitioner is the defendant, whereas the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.71 of 2007 on the file of the Sub-Court, Tuticorin. The suit is for declaration and recovery of possession. The petitioner filed a written statement. After framing necessary issues, the suit was listed for trial. P.Ws.1 & 2 were examined on the respondent side. The respondent's side evidence was closed. At that stage, the petitioner filed two applications in I.A.Nos.586 of 2010 and 587 of 2010 to re-open and recall the respondent's evidence. The petitioner filed a counter affidavit resisting the same. Considering the materials on record, the learned Judge dismissed both the applications by the order dated 28.03.2011. Against the order of dismissal, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. 2. Now, when the Civil Revision Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent has made an endorsement that he has no objection to allow this Civil Revision Petition. 3. Recording his no objection, the impugned order of the learned Single Judge passed in I.A.Nos.586 and 587 of 2010, dated 28.03.2011 is set aside and I.A.Nos.586 and 587 of 2010 are allowed. The learned Sub-Judge, Thoothukudi is directed to complete the trial in O.S.No.71 of 2007, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, not later than three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. The parties shall co-operate with the trial. With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed, based on the no objection endorsed by the learned counsel for the respondent. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.(md).No.1 of 2011 is closed.