Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 2886 (MAD)

M. Ochathevar v. K. Kumarasamy

2014-08-26

R.KARUPPIAH

body2014
Judgment 1. There is no representation for the appellant in the previous hearing dates, and hence the Second Appeal is directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondent is present and reported ready today. 2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.