JUDGMENT Arvind Kumar Tripathi, J: - Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 629 of 2013, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC & 3/4 D.P.Act, P.S. Mandi, District Saharanpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that due to some misunderstanding, the impugned complaint was lodged. He further submitted that if the matter is referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre then there is chance of compromise in between the parties. 4. Learned AGA opposed the aforesaid prayer. 5. Considered the submission of counsel for the parties. In the interest of justice, and in view of the facts and circumstances, if an application is moved on behalf of applicants within 30 days from today before the court below and Rs.1,000/- is deposited in cash before the court below in favour of Mediation Centre and a draft for a sum of Rs. 4,000/- is deposited in favour of opposite party no.2 Smt. Reshma wife of Faisal, the matter will be referred to the Mediation Centre situated at District Court Saharanpur. The aforesaid draft in the name of opposite party no. 2 shall be handed over to her on first appearance. 6. Till report of the Mediation Centre is received, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in Complaint Case No. 629 of 2013. After receiving the report of the Mediation Centre, if it is found that the matter has been settled between parties then no useful purpose would be served to continue the criminal proceedings hence the same may be dropped in view of the judgment of Apex Court in case of B.S.Joshi Vs. State of Haryana 2003(4)SCC Page 675. 7. With aforesaid observations, the present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off.