Judgment: Shri Rahul Jain, learned counsel points out that in this petition, right from 30th of June, 2011, this Court has been asking the petitioner, as to how, the petition is maintainable, when a remedy of revision is available and except for the time granted, the petitioner is unable to demonstrate that the petition directly before this Court without taking recourse to the remedy available is maintainable. A perusal of the order passed by this Court on 30th of June, 2011 goes to show that when the matter was taken up for hearing, petitioner's counsel was directed to indicate as to how, the petition can be entertained, when an alternate remedy of civil revision is available. The petitioner took time and, thereafter, when the matter taken up on 8.8.2011, learned counsel again took time. Subsequently, the petition is listed continuously from 19.8.2011 and till 17.2.2014, none is appearing for the petitioner now for the arguments on the question of existence of remedy in the matter. Municipal Council Vs. M.P. Wakf Board & Ors. Considering the fact that the petition itself is not maintainable, as the remedy of filing a civil revision is available, we see no reason to interfere into the matter. The petition is accordingly, dismissed, as not maintainable before this Court.