JUDGMENT Vijay Prakash Pathak, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Present petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 20.08.2014 and criminal proceeding of complaint case no.198 of 2014 (Smt. Sarita Vs. Badam Singh and others), under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Rijor, District Etah, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/ Judicial Magistrate, Court No.22, Etah. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that it is a matrimonial dispute between husband and wife and the matter may very well be settled through mediation, hence the matter may be referred to the Mediation Centre of District Court at Etah. 4. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that if the petitioners move an application within 30 days from today before the court below for mediation along with a draft of Rs.1000/- in favour of Mediation Centre at Etah and a draft of Rs.5000/- in favour of Smt. Sarita, opposite party no.2, the matter shall be referred to the Mediation Centre situated at district court Etah. The aforesaid draft, if deposited, in the name of opposite party no.2, the same shall be handed over to her on her first appearance. The Mediation Centre, Etah shall consider the matter in respect of mediation between the parties and shall submit its report to the Magistrate concerned within two months. 5. Till report of the Mediation Centre is received, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. 6. After receiving the report/settlement of Mediation Centre, the learned Magistrate shall proceed in the matter in accordance with law. With aforesaid observations, the petition is finally disposed off.