Judgment 1. The petitioner is the wife of the deceased who are alleged to be murdered on 11.05.2014. The petitioner contends that her husband Sundar was murdered with deadly weapons by five persons, on 11.05.2014 at about 11.45 p.m. and the petitioner gave a complaint on 12.05.2014. On the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner a case has been registered under Sections 147, 148 and 302 IPC in Crime No. 142 of 2014 and she stated that the case has not been properly investigated and hence the petitioner is before this Court. Moreover, the accused persons are also threatening the petitioner to withdraw the complaint. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has been filed and it has not been taken on file. 4. The petitioner's contention is that neither she nor her in-laws were examined by the Inspector of Police, namely the third respondent and without examining the key witnesses, the third respondent filed a charge sheet which cannot be accepted. 5. The allegations of the wife who lost her husband that she was not examined cannot be ignored. Moreover, she further submits that her in-laws also were not examined. 6. In view of the above circumstances, it is appropriate to order further investigation. Therefore, the above case is reopened and the second respondent is directed to entrust the matter to some other Inspector of Police who shall reinvestigate the matter and file a final report within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.