Judgment V.K. Bist, J.(Oral) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned letter/order dated 08.03.2014 issued by respondent no. 6. Respondent no. 7 issued a notice/letter to the petitioner on 8th Mach 2014 asking him to submit no dues certificate in a specified format. In said letter, it is written that the petitioner took advances amounting Rs. 59,250/-, Rs 48,832.70/- and Rs. 67,797/- from the University fund but even after his retirement, he has not adjusted the same. By said notice, the petitioner has been asked to adjust the said amount otherwise the amount would be recovered from his dues. By the said letter, the petitioner was also informed that house rent, water charges, house loan and electricity charges are also outstanding against him. The counsel for the petitioner admits the outstanding house rent, water charges, house loan and electricity charges but submits that advances taken by him had already been adjusted by him before his retirement and after his retirement he has no concern with that amount. The respondents filed counter affidavit. In para 20 of the counter affidavit they came up with the case: “the petitioner is entitled to get Rs. 86,442/- + 2,31,660/-= 3,18,102/- but due to non adjustment of outstanding dues of Rs. 2,21, 354.70/- against the petitioner, the petitioner is entitle Rs. 96,747.30/- after submission of ‘No Dues Certificate.” Thus, the respondents admit that after adjustment of outstanding amount, the petitioner is entitled for Rs.96,747/-. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the record pertaining to the amount, which was taken by him as advances, is with the University. He contends that the petitioner is not being permitted to look into the record and is not being permitted to enter in the office of respondent no. 4/ Comptroller/ Finance Controller. He submits that in case petitioner is permitted, he will be in a position to explain everything to respondent no. 4. At this, the learned Senior Advocate for the respondent nos. 3 to 7 submits that petitioner is free to come to the office of respondent no. 4 and he will be shown all the documents and the petitioner will be required to explain in what manner he has spent the amount and adjusted the amount which was taken by him as advance. 3 to 7 submits that petitioner is free to come to the office of respondent no. 4 and he will be shown all the documents and the petitioner will be required to explain in what manner he has spent the amount and adjusted the amount which was taken by him as advance. For this purpose, we fix 10th September 2014. On the said date, respondent no. 4 shall permit the petitioner to appear before him. Thereafter, Respondent no. 4 will take a decision in the matter and will inform the petitioner about the decision taken by him and will pay the dues of the petitioner for which he is entitled. We leave it open to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order, in case need arises. Respondent no. 4 shall take decision within a period of 15 days from the date fixed.