Judgment : 1. When the Appeal was filed, as against the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.154 of 1995, the Appellate Court returned the papers with an endorsement that description of the parties as given in the short cause title is different from that of the description in the long cause title and therefore the decree should be amended. 2. The plaintiffs filed an Application to amend the decree incorporating the details regarding the death of D1, D8 and D9. The said Application was dismissed stating that after passing of the decree and after filing of the Appeal, the trial Court is not empowered to amend the decree. Challenging the same, the present Revision Petition has been filed. 3. A perusal of the order passed by the Court below would go to show that provisions of section 152 of Civil Procedure Code has not been correctly appreciated by the Court below. The order reads that only clerical mistake can be corrected and other details cannot be rectified, especially after trial and pronouncement of the Judgment. 4. The order passed by the Court below patently suffer from illegality as Section 152 of Civil Procedure Code has not been applied to the facts of the case in proper perspective. It is only a clerical mistake in omitting to state that D1, D8 & D9 are dead. This aspect has been omitted to be mentioned in the short cause title. 5. Therefore, the order passed by the Court dismissing the Application for amendment is set aside and the Sub-Court, Chidambaram is directed to carry out the amendment, i.e. incorporating the fact that D1, D8 and D9 are dead, as described in the petition seeking amendment, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.1. The details of the amendment to be done read as under: In the Judgment and in the decree, add the word “died” after the name of each of the defendants D1, D8 and D9. 6. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No costs.