Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2014 DIGILAW 3488 (MAD)

Subramanian v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Sankarankoil Town Police Station, Tirunelveli District

2014-09-19

N.KIRUBAKARAN

body2014
Judgment : 1. At the instance of the second respondent/de-facto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioners under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 323, 355, 324, 506(ii) IPC and 3(1)(X) SC/ST Act, in Crime No.581 of 2011. The said F.I.R is being challenged before this Court. 2. When the matter is called today, both the petitioners as well as the second respondent are present before this Court and the second respondent would submit that the matter has been settled between the parties and he does not want to proceed with the matter. 3. In view of the categorical statement made by the second respondent, no useful purpose will be achieved by further proceeding in the matter. 4. In view of the above, the Crime No.581 of 2011 on the file of the first respondent, is quashed against the petitioners and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed.