JUDGMENT Anil Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State counsel and perused the record. 2. As the controversy involved in the present case is trivial in nature so with the consent of learned counsels for the parties present today, the present writ petition is finally disposed of at the admission stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Additional Civil Judge, Court No. II, District Lakhimpur Kheri may be directed to decide the Eviction Suit bearing No. 05/2013 (Shan Gupta and another Vs. Jagannath Bhalla) as provided under sub rule 3 of rule 15 of U.P. Urban Building (Regulaation of Rent and Eviction), 1972 expeditiously because the same is not decided till date and adjourned on one or other pretext adopted by the contesting respondents, hence present writ petition has been filed with by the petitioners for redressal of their grievances. 4. Thus, after hearing learned counsel for parties and going through the records, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No. 1/Additional Civil Judge, Court No. 2, District Lakhimpur Kheri initiated in pursuance to the order passed in Eviction Suit bearing No. 05/2013 (Shan Gupta and another Vs. Jagannath Bhalla) expeditiously, after hearing learned counsel for parties in accordance with law.